SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 12571

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
KINGSHUK KAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent


24.04.2025 Court No. 25 S.G. (p.a)

WPA 21822 of 2024 Kingshuk Kar Vs.

State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sankar Nath Mukherjee, Mr. Niraj Gupta, Mr. Manisha Paswan, … for the Petitioner.

Mr. Barun Kumar Samanta … for the added respondents. Mr. Pantu Deb Roy, ld. A.G.P., Mr. Pannalal Bandopadhyay …for the State

1) The question determinable in this writ petition is whether the respondent authorities have acted just legal and proper, in issuing the vacancy notice dated July 19, 2024, thereby declaring 12 vacancies, for the route “Nayabad Bus Terminus to Kolkata”, on which the writ petitioner used to ply his vehicle, on the strength of a permit, but has remained non operational, for a considerable period of time. It is also under scrutiny of this court if the respondent authorities have acted just, legal and proper, by allowing the applications for issuance of permit of the appellant/private respondents and granting them offer letters, pursuant to their applications in response to the vacancy notice dated July 19, 2024.

2) The writ petitioners permit is No 002/Nayabad to Kolkata Station/New-/2011, which has expired on July 6, 2016. Thereafter, on March

4, 2024 the writ petitioner has stated to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top