SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 12602

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
AJAY RAM AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
SUDHA MADHAB CHAKRABORTY – Respondent


Court No. 6 CO 356 of 2025 (265719)

10.03.2025 Ajay Ram & Anr.

(AD 38) Vs.

Sudha Madhab Chakraborty (S. Banerjee)

Mr. Uday Shankar Bhattacharya Ms. Sudeshna Basu Thakur Ms. Banani Bhattacharjee Ms. Upasana Das …for the petitioners Ms. Debjani Sengupta Mr. Ratan Pal Ms. Poulomi Ghosh …for the opposite party This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order dated December 16, 2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), 4th Court at Alipore in Title Suit No. 177 of 2023. By the order impugned the application under Order 26 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure stood allowed and a Commissioner was appointed to record the evidence on examination and cross-examination of the plaintiff, namely Sudha Madhab Chakraborty as PW-1. The application for examination of PW-1 on commission was on the ground that he is 86 years old and is suffering from various ailments.

Mr. Bhattacharya, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that no prescription and/or medical documents have been produced to show that the plaintiff is suffering from Parkinson’s disease. Pursuant to the order dated February 26, 2025, the learned advocate for the oppos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top