SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 13077

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
CHAITANYA KUMAR DEY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA (ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION)

ORIGINAL SIDE RESERVED ON: 17.12.2025 DELIVERED ON: 09.01.2026 PRESENT:

HON'BLE JUSTICE GAURANG KANTH AP-777 OF 2016 CHAITANYA KUMAR DEY VERSUS UNION OF INDIA Mr. Sarajit Sen, Adv.

Mr. Tapas Singha, Adv.

….. for the petitioner Ms. Aparna Banerjee, Adv.

….. for the respondent JUDGMENT Gaurang Kanth, J.:-

1. The petitioner in the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is challenging the Arbitral Award dated 13.06.2016 passed by the Sole Arbitrator Sri. Arunava Ghosh in the Arbitration Agreement arising out of the agreement No. 4/T/II/03-04 dated 23.04.2003.

2. The facts leading to the present petition are as follows:

3. The respondent, i.e., the Divisional Manager-III, Eastern Railway, Sealdah, by Memo No. 222-S/1/164/WII dated 03.02.2003, awarded to the petitioner the work of T.S.R. (P) from Km 168.002 to Km 177.00 (9.00 km) with PSC sleepers, including ancillary works, under SE/P-Way, Bhagwangola, within the jurisdiction of AEN, Ranaghat. The stipulated period for completion of the work was nine months.

4. During the execution of the work, extensions of time were granted to the pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top