SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 13225

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
HOOGHLY INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ANANDI RAJAK AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul)

WPA 25455 of 2024 Hooghly Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Vs Anandi Rajak & Ors.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumya Majumder, Sr. Adv.

Mr. S.K. Singh, Mr. R.K. Dubey.

For the State : Mr. Dipanjan Datta, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Soumen Chatterjee.

Hearing concluded on : 10.02.2025 Judgment on : 04.03.2025 SHAMPA DUTT (PAUL), J. :

1. The present writ application has been filed praying for direction upon the respondents not to give further effect orders dated 18.05.2016 and 31.05.2024, passed by the Controlling Authority and the Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

2. The petitioner’s case is in short is that the Respondent No. 1 was engaged in Petitioner Company as a Badli worker on 07.03.1976.

The Respondent No.1 got his provident fund membership only on 04.11.1981. The Respondent No.1 attained his age of superannuation on 06.08.2009 as Badli itself. Throughout this period i.e., 07.03.1976 to 06.08.2009 the respondent no.1 worked as badli employee i.e., in place and stead of permanent employees, who are absent for any reason whatsoever. The certified standing orders

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top