SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 13408

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
ILA BISWAS & ORS – Appellant
Versus
SANTOSH KUMAR BAIDY & ANR – Respondent


365. (ML)

12.12.2025 Ct. No. 02 (ARPAN IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL CIVIL Jurisdiction (Appellate Side)

CPAN 823 OF 2017 In W.P.A. 22996 OF 2016 ILA BISWAS & OTHERS VS.

MR. SANTOSH KUMAR BAIDY, S/O SATISH BAIDYA, THE PRODHAN, SHIMULPUR GRAM PANCHAYAT, NORTH 24 PARGANAS & OTHERS Mr. Bhagbat Chowdhury, Adv.

Mr. Subrata Mukherjee, Adv.

…for the Applicants Mr. Omar Faruk Gazi, Adv.

Mr. Saikat Samanta, Adv.

…for the Alleged Contemnors

1. Contempt application is heard in presence of the learned advocates representing the applicants and the alleged contemnors.

2. Learned advocate representing the applicants submits that order dated 10th April, 2017 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench on the connected writ petition is violated by not demolishing portion of the building in question which was constructed beyond the sanctioned plan.

3. It is further submitted on behalf of the applicants that steps were taken by the concerned Panchayat authority to find out nature of the alleged construction in terms of the order dated 10th April, 2017 and an enquiry report was submitted dated 3rd February, 2018 wherein it is indicated that while making construction deviations were made and construction was not made

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top