14.05.2025 Item No. 12 Ct. No. 30 WPA 3104 of 2025 AN M/s. STP Limited vs.

The Employees Provident Fund Organisation & anr.

Mr. Ranjay De Mr. Basabjit Banerjee Mr. A. B. Bose … for the petitioner Mr. Avijit Tewary … for the respondents E.P.F. Authorities Heard the parties.

Supplementary affidavit annexing relevant documents has been filed by the petitioner which is taken on record.

It appears that inspite of there being an interim order of stay passed by this Court, vide its order dated 11.03.2025, the respondent authorities have issued a notice dated 30.04.2025 claiming the sum which is in dispute in the present case.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent Provident Fund Authorities submits that the said order has been passed due to non-communication and as such necessary orders may be passed.

Considering the conduct of the respondent authorities who have issued further orders inspite of an interim order of stay by this Court, the order dated

30.04.2025 issued by the Authorised Officer to the Recovery Officer stands quashed.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that an appeal has been preferred by them being EPF Appeal No. 1 of 2025 before the Central Govern