IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE PRESENT: - THE HON’BLE JUSTICE PRASENJIT BISWAS FMA 1315 of 2016 Smt. Philisita Kujur versus The Divisional Manager Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. For the Appellant/Claimant : Mr. Saidur Rahaman, Adv.

For the Insurance Company : Mr. Parimal Kumar Pahari, Adv. Delivered on : 27.02.2025 (dictated in open court)

Prasenjit Biswas, J.:-

1. The instant appeal is filed challenging the impugned judgment and award dated 26.04.2012 passed by the learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, 2nd Court, Dakshin Dinajpur at Balurghat in connection with MAC Case No. 01 of 2008.

2. By passing the impugned judgment and award, the learned Tribunal claimant/appellant.

3. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the said impugned judgment and award, the appellant/claimant has preferred this instant appeal.

4. It is submitted by the learned advocates appearing on behalf of both the parties that the instant appeal can be disposed of in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court rendered in case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Urmila Halder in connection with Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.

6260 of 2019.

5. The instant claim petition was filed under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act by the claimants being the parents of the deceased on account of death of his son in a road traffic accident. During pendency of the case before the Tribunal, the father of the deceased expired. Accordingly, his name was expunged from the claim petition.

6. On fateful day, the son of the claimant/appellant was coming towards his residence, Fulbari from the house of his relative situated at Daralhat along with left side of the road on riding a bi-cycle. The offending vehicle being No. W.B. 59/6717 which was proceeding towards Balurghat from Gangarampur at a very high speed and in negligent manner came on wrong side of the road at Mohanpur and dashed the bi-cycle. As a result the victim fell down on the ground and the offending vehicle ran over him and he sustained severe injuries on his person. He was immediately taken to Hospital wherein he succumbed to injuries.

7. The claimants filed an application under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act praying for getting compensation for the accidental death of their son. The said case was contested by the Insurance Company by filing written statement. Evidences were adduced by the claimant before the Tribunal and after taking into consideration the evidences, both oral and documentary of the claimant.

8. The instant case was filed under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, which falls under “no fault liability” and the claimant has to prove only the involvement of the offending vehicle and the accident in which the victim sustained injuries and subsequently succumbed to those injuries.

9. Although the notice of appeal was served upon the owner of the offending vehicle despite that he did not venture to appear and contest the present appeal.

10. The only point for consideration before this Court is whether amendment in Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which came into effect by a gazette notification on 22nd May, 2018 would relate to an accident which had occurred prior to the said date. Learned Advocate for the claimants submitted that the present appeal is filed with a prayer for enhancement of the compensation amount awarded to the claimants in view of the amendment made by a gazette notification on 22nd May, 2018 in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The said amendment stipulates that when a person died due to motor traffic accident the claimant/ claimants is/are entitled to get Rs. 5 lakh as lump sum amount of compensation.

11. It is profitable to quote the observation of the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of Urmila Halder (supra) which interalia says that-

“10. The order of the High Court is well discussed and we agree with the view taken. We may, however, add that a beneficial legislation would necessarily entail the benefit to be passed o