CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
AJIT PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS – Respondent
22.01.2025.
PB Sl. No.30. Ct. No.25.
WPA 12028 of 2019 With CAN 1 of 2025 Ajit Prasad Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Ms. Susmita Saha Dutta, Mr. Niladri Saha, Ms. Madhurima Basu, Ms. Pallabi Ghosh.
… For the Petitioner.
Ms. Suchitra Banerjee, Mr. Indranil Banerjee.
…..for the respondent no.7.
Mr. Shehnaz Tareq Mina, Mr. Manoj Mondal.
…..for the State.
CAN 1 of 2025, is an application by the petitioner seeking amendment of the writ petition as per the schedule of amendment as mentioned therein.
According to the learned advocate for the petitioner, the amendments as sought for are necessary for the proper adjudication of the case and are based on the development subsequently occurred, after filing of the writ petition. The amendments basically relate to incorporation of the pleadings regarding ingenuinity of the transfer certificate of the respondent no.7 and the petitioner’s prayer for proper investigation to unearth the truth with relation to the same.
Learned advocate for the respondent no.7 has raised strong objection so far as the application being CAN 1 of 2025, is concerned. According to him, the amendments would be contradictory to the directions given by the Hon’ble Division Bench
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.