SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 14211

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
JYOTIRMAY MAITY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent


ASR 27.

Ct. no. 24. 15.1.2025 WPA 28457 of 2024 Jyotirmay Maity Vs.

State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Sujit Kumar Rath Mr. Subir Hazra Mr. Sukumar Sarkar Mr. Anirban Saha …..For the petitioner Ms. Sonal Sinha Ms. A. Chakraborty ……For the State Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner, is taken on record.

The present petitioners challenged impugned vacancy notification for appointment of FPS dealer over the operational area, where the present petitioner is already running F.P. Shop dealership business with an unblemished track record and full satisfaction since long.

Mr. Sujit Kr. Rath, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has challenged the vacancy notification on the ground that after Targeted Public Distribution (Control) Order, 2015, the Control Order 2013, on the basis of which the vacancy has been declared, has become redundant. He seeks for interim protection to the extent that the State can proceed with the selection process but should not grant licence till the issue is decided by this Court in batch of appeals, hearing of which has already been started.

Learned advocate for the State-respondents seeks to file report in the form of affidavi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top