SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 14236

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
FROSTEES INDIA PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
AHUJA AND CO. A PARTNERSHIP FIRM – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma C.O. 3416 of 2022 Frostees India Private Limited Vs.

Ahuja & Company For the Petitioner: Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee, Sr. Adv., Mr. Suchetan Ghosh, Adv.

For the opposite party: Mr. Jishnu Chowdhury, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sankarsan Sarkar, Adv., Mr. Kritin Saraf, Adv.

Reserved on: 25.06.2025 Judgment on: 30.07.2025 Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.:

1. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated September 19, 2022 passed by the Learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) First Court, Alipur, in Title suit no. 364 of 2020, whereby the Learned Trial Court while disposing of the application under Order 39, Rule 10 read with Section 151 CPC, filed by the plaintiff/opposite party, directed the petitioner/defendant to pay Rs.1,50,000/- per month within tenth of each succeeding english calendar month from this state to the plaintiff/opposite party as occupational charge of suit property. The petitioners/defendant was further directed to make payment of Rs.72,00,000/- on account of arrears of occupational charges in four equal installments every second month within tenth of each cale

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top