SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 14374

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
ABDUL ZABBAR AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent


26 10.01.

2025 FMA 178 of 2024 IA No. CAN 2 of 2023 Ct. No. 08 Ab Abdul Zabbar and others Vs.

State of West Bengal and others ---------------

Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, Mf. Prahlad Chandra Ghosh, Mr. Subir Hazra.

… for the appellants.

Ms. Mousumi Chaudhury, Mr. Supriya Majumder.

… for the State.

Mr. Avishek Prasad.

Mr. Sourodeep Singha. … for the DPSC, Malda.

The solitary grievance raised in the writ petition by the writ petitioners/appellants is denial of the retiral and/or pensionary benefits solely on the ground of having not rendered qualifying period of service. The Writ Court after recording the facts arrived at the decision that since the writ petitioners/appellants have not rendered services, which would come within the ambit of the qualifying services for the purpose of such benefits, the relief claimed in the writ petition cannot be granted.

Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellants, submits that the Co-ordinate Bench in case of The State of West Bengal and others vs. Kartick Chandra Das and others (FMA 677 of 2015) decided on 18th February 2020 wherein the considerable shortfall in qualifying period of service was directed t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top