SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 3136

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


CRA 719 of 2016

With

CRAN 2 of 2026


Manindra Nath Mishri

v.

The State of West Bengal & Anr


For the Appellant : Mr. Sekhar Kumar Basu, Ld. Sr. Adv.

Mr. Antarikhya Basu,

Miss Madhumita Basak


For the State : Mr. Debasish Roy, ld. P.P.,

Mr. Suman De,

Ms. Trisha Rakshit.


Hearing concluded on: May 7th, 2026.

Judgment on : May 11th, 2026.

Rajasekhar Mantha, J.:

1. The subject appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated December 5th, 2016 and order of sentence dated December 6th, 2016 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Haldia Purba Medinipur in Sessions Trial No. 89 of 2014. The appellant was convicted under sections 302 and 498A, IPC.

2. For the commission of the offence under Section 302, IPC, the appellant was sentenced to a rigorous imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-. In default, to further undergo a rigorous imprisonment for 6 months.

3. For the offence under Section 498A, IPC, he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and pay a fine of Rs 10 000/-. In default, he was to further undergo a rigorous imprisonment for 6 months. The 50% of the fine amount, if realized, was directed to be paid to PW 1, the father of the victim.

THE PROSECUTION CASE AND EVIDENCE ON RECORD

4. The husband of the victim strangulated the latter to death at her matrimonial home. The victim failed to bring money from her parental home. Prior to the death of the victim, the appellant used to torture her since she protested against the extra-marital affairs of the appellant. The appellant was the permanent employee of the India Oil Corporation.

5. On June 6th, 2013, around 7 A.M., the appellant informed PW 1, the father of the victim, over the telephone that the victim had committed suicide. PW 1 reached the PO and found that the victim is lying dead on the floor. He found a napkin is hanging over the ceiling fan.

6. PW 1 came to learn from his grandson, PW 10, that the appellant, on the last night, had taken the victim to a separate room, drew them out (children of the victim), and mercilessly beat the victim. The victim was crying for help, which, however, stopped after some time.

7. Based on the above, PW 1 lodged the complaint dated June 7th, 2013. It culminated into the FIR no. 75 of 2013 dated June 7th, 2013, under Section 498A and 302 of the IPC, lodged by Haldia PS, Purba Medinipur.

8. The inquest on the body of the victim and PO was conducted on June 6, 2013, by PW 8, the ASI of the said Haldia PS. The inquest report recorded that the appellant found the victim hanging from the ceiling fan. The victim hanged herself by a napkin. It found one black bent mark on the throat of the victim. The victim was found wearinga sanitary pad. A black coloured T-shirt and white pyjama were lying near the body of the victim kept on the floor.

9. The inquest report indicates that the witnesses present at the PO have stated that the victim has committed suicide. PW 1, the father of the victim, was an inquest witness.

10. Post mortem was conducted on June 6th, 2013, by PW 12. He has deposed that the death was caused by violent asphyxia. The death is most likely homicidal. Some scratch marks were found on the right ear. Hydroid bone was, however, found unbroken.

11. Investigation was completed and charge sheet was filed. Charges were framed under Sec. 498A and 302 of the IPC on December 10th, 2014 against the appellant. The trial commenced.

12. PW 1 was the father of the victim. He lodged the said complaint dated June 7, 2013 with the Haldia PS. He confirmed the case of the prosecution as narrated in his complaint. There are however some minor omissions in his evidence recorded during the trial.

13. In his complaint, he stated that the appellant had informed him that the victim had committed suicide. During the trial, he, however, has deposed that he received information that the victim had committed suicide. He did not name the person from whom he received the said information.

14. In his complaint, PW 1has stated that when he reached the PO, PW 10, his grandson, told him that the appellant had mercilessly beaten the victim after locking her in a separate room in the night of June 5th, 2013 i.e. one day prior to the fateful day on June 6th, 2013, when the dead body of the victim was found lying on the floor and one ghamcha (towel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top