IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
MADHURESH PRASAD, PRASENJIT BISWAS
Anil Kumar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Food Corporation of India – Respondent
Judgment :
Madhuresh Prasad, J.
1. Heard the learned senior advocate for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The petitioner was proceeded against on an allegation of having obtained employment in the respondent organization on the basis of a manufactured caste certificate bearing No. 1316/88, dated 19.12.1988 purported to be issued by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Asansol. The petitioner unsuccessfully faced the proceeding and thereafter assailed the outcome.The writ petitioner relied upon the enquiry report, but assailed the findings of the Disciplinary Authority dated 05.10.2005 whereby and whereunder, the petitioner was dismissed from service. In an earlier writ proceeding W.P. 21536 (W) of 2005 the Writ Court was of the view that the petitioner was denied a fair opportunity of hearing.
3. The order of the Disciplinary Authority was set aside by the Writ Court keeping the respondents’ option open to take steps pursuant to the enquiry report in accordance with law. A time frame was specified by the Writ Court.
4. Thereafter,the Disciplinary Authority served a disagreement notice on the petitioner differing with the findings of the Enquiry Officer. The petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.