CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
THE HANUMAN ESTATES LIMITED – Respondent
APD 14 / 2023
##PAGE1##
OD-7
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
APD/14/2023
WITH
CS/12/2013
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
VS
THE HANUMAN ESTATES LIMITED
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK
-AND-
The Hon’ble JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
For the Appellant : Mr. Debajyoti Datta, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Arijit Doss Mullick, Adv.
Ms. Pallabi Sardar, Adv.
For the Respondent : Mr. Sabyasachi Choudhury, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Urmila Chakraborty, Adv.
Mr. Amit Meharia, Adv.
Ms. Paramita Banerjee, Adv.
Mr. Rohan Raj, Adv.
Mr. Tamoghna Chattopadhyay, Adv.
HEARD ON : 06.05.2026
DELIVERED ON : 06.05.2026
DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:-
1. Appeal is at the behest of a defendant in a suit for eviction and
directed against the judgment and decree dated December 20,
2022. By the impugned judgment and decree, learned Trial Judge,
accepted the report of the Special Referee, fixing mesne profit.
##PAGE2##2
2. Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant refers to the
sequence of events occurring in the suit. He submits that, on May
7, 2015, a decree for eviction was passed under Chapter XIIIA of
the Original Side Rules. He points out that, the Commercial Courts
Act, 2015 came into force on October 23, 2015. He refers to the
fixation of specified value subsequent thereto. He submits that, on
November 15, 2018, State Government issued a Notification
declaring specified value of commercial suit to be not less than
Rs.1 crore. He points out that, on February 20, 2020, an
application was filed for appointment of Special Referee to assess
the mesne profit. A Special Referee was appointed on February 27,
2020. Subsequently, the Special Referee submitted a report. The
appellant took the exception to the report by way of an application
being IA No. GA/6/2020 while, the respondent filed an application
being IA No. GA/5/2020 for acceptance of the report.
3. Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that, the
suit was not transferred to the Commercial Division although, the
subject matter of the suit involved commercial disputes within the
meaning of the Act of 2015. He relies upon the judgment and order
dated April 20, 2026 passed in APO/25/2025 (Rajshri
Productions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. T.E. Thomson and Company Ltd.),
AIR 1954 SC 340 (Kiran Singh Vs. Chaman Paswan), judgment
and order dated April 1, 2026 passed in APO/144/2023 (Awam
Marketting LLP Vs. M/S. Orient Beverages Limited and Ors.),
2019 SCC Online Cal 3215 (Surajit Sen Vs. Royal Bank of
##PAGE3##3
Scotland NV), 2026 SCC Online Cal 468 (Tractel Tirfor India
Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Tractel International S.A.S) and APO/48/2021
(Starlift Services Private Limited Vs. Syama Prasad Mookerjee
Port, Kolkata) in support of proposition that, the Court passing
the impugned judgment and decree did not possess requisite
jurisdiction under the Act of 2015 and therefore, the same is a
nullity.
4. Referring to the merits of the case, learned Advocate appearing for
the appellant submits that, the Special Referee erred in fixing the
rate of mesne profit in the manner as done. He submits that,
although the learned Special Referee as also the learned Trial
Judge failed to take into consideration the fact that, the property
concerned was without any amenities as available to the other
properties which were taken into consideration for the purpose of
fixation of the mesne profit. He points out that, facilities such as
car parking spaces, lifts and V. Satellite facility, ATM and other
amenities were not available at the subject premises while, they
were available to other properties.
5. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the respondent refers to the
order dated April 22, 2026 passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court
in Civil Appeal No. 006873 of 2026 [SLP (C) No. 8111 of 2026]
(Shri Balaji Industrial Engineering Ltd. Vs. Steel Authority of
India Ltd.) to contend that, since, the learned Judge passing the
impugned order was also with the relevant determination/roster of
the Commercial Division, the impugned judgment and order
##PAGE4##4
cannot be faulted on the basis as sought to be contended by the
app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.