SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Cal) 91

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SWAPAN SEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.

1. This appeal is directed against an order of conviction and judgment dated 17.02.2010 and 18.02.2010 passed by the Learned Judge, Special Court (E.C. Act-cum Additional Sessions Judge), Hooghly in Sessions Trial No.16 of 2005 arising out of Sessions Case No.49 of 2005, thereby convicting the appellant under Sections 366, 342, 376 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 6 months more for the offence under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code and also suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 2 months more for the offence under Section 342 of the Indian Penal Code and also suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 1 year more for the offence under Section 376 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code and all the sentences were run concurrently.

2. The prosecution case precisely stated on 03.10.2003, the appellant dishonestly and deceitfully indu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top