CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
INDIAN EXPLOSIVES PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
IDEAL DETONATORS PVT LTD AND ORS – Respondent
APD 13 / 2023
##PAGE1##
OCD-5
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
COMMERCIAL DIVISION
ORIGINAL SIDE
APD/13/2023
WITH
CS/48/2023
INDIAN EXPLOSIVES PVT LTD
VS
IDEAL DETONATORS PVT LTD AND ORS
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK
-AND-
The Hon’ble JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI
For the Appellant : Mr. Ranjan Bachawat, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Rudraman Bhattacharyya, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sourajit Dasgupta, Adv.
Mr. Bhavesh Garodia, Adv.
Mr. Subhankar Chakraborty, Adv.
Ms. Sayani Gupta, Adv.
For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Surajit Nath Mitra, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Chittapriya Ghosh, Adv.
Ms. Aiswariya Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Somesh Ghosh, Adv.
Mr. Soham Sanyal, Adv.
For Respondent Nos. 2, 6
& 7 : Mr. Utpal Bose, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Saptarshi Banerjee, Adv.
Mrs. Anisha Kochar, Adv.
HEARD ON : 05.05.2026
DELIVERED ON : 05.05.2026
##PAGE2##2
DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:-
1. Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated July 11,
2023 passed in GA/2/2023 in CS/48/2023.
2. By the impugned judgment and order, learned Single Judge
allowed the application of the defendant no. 1 in the suit, seeking
revocation of the dispensation granted under Section 12A of the
Commercial Courts Act, 2015. Learned Single Judge held that
there was no ground seeking dispensation with the requirement of
Section 12A of the Act of 2015. The averments made in the plaint
did not warrant dispensation under Section 12A of the Act of
2015. The provisions of the pre-institution mediation must be
complied with. Consequently, learned Single Judge, rejected the
plaint.
3. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant submits that,
leave under Section 12A of the Act of 2015 was granted to the
appellant on March 23, 2023. Interim order was granted in favour
of the appellant on March 27, 2023.
4. Referring the merits of the case, learned Senior Advocate
appearing for the appellant submits that, the defendant no. 2 was
an employee of the appellant. Defendant no. 2 was obliged not to
part with any confidential information during his employment with
the appellant to any third party. In breach of such confidentiality
agreement, the defendant no. 2 parted with confidential
informations to the defendant no. 1. Consequently, the defendant
no. 2, infringed the copyrights existing in favour of the appellant.
##PAGE3##3
5. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant refers to the
various averments made in the plaint and in particular to
paragraph 21 thereof. He submits that, the defendant no. 2
indulged in such activities since 2016. Such activities were not
known to the appellant, till its discovery in 2022. Immediately on
discovery of such illegal activities, a criminal complaint was filed.
Thereafter, the present suit was instituted in the month of March,
2023 when, leave under Section 12A of the Act of 2015 was
obtained and as also an interim order.
6. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellant relies upon
2023 SCC Online Cal 2443 (Gavrill Metal Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Maira
Fabricators Pvt. Ltd.), 2023 SCC Online SC 1382 (Yamini
Manohar Vs. T.K.D Keerthi) and 2025 SCC Online SC 2278
(Novenco Building and Industry A/S Vs. Xero Energy
Engineering Solutions Private Ltd and Another) to contend that,
leave under Section 12A of the Act of 2015 ought not to be
recalled, at least, in the facts and circumstances of the present
case. According to him, learned Single Judge erred in doing so.
7. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the defendant no. 1
submits that, the provisions of Section 12A of the Act of 2015 are
mandatory. In the facts and circumstances of the present case, he
submits that, the appellant tried to overcome such mandatory
provisions. The appellant should not be permitted to do so.
8. Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the defendant no. 1 draws
the attention of the Court to the pleadings of the plaint and in
particular to paragraph 21 thereof. He submits that, in the earlier
##PAGE4##4
portions of the pleadings of the plaint, the appellant did not aver
that, the appellant was not aware of the incidents happening since
2016. He submits that, the incidents occurring were from 2016.
9. Relying upon 202
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.