CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
MADAN CHANDRA HALDER – Appellant
Versus
ALOKE RANJAN AICH BHOWMICK – Respondent
SAT 26 / 2026
##PAGE1##
D/L.7.
May 20, 2026.
.
MNS
SAT No. 26 of 2026
+
CAN 1 of 2026
Madan Chandra Halder
Vs.
Aloke Ranjan Aich Bhowmick
Md. Mokaram Hossain,
Mr. Mizanur Rahaman,
Mr. Karnab Biswas, Advs.
… for the appellant.
Mr. Prasanta Bishal
…for the respondent.
1. Insofar as the report of the Additional Stamp Reporter
regarding the valuation of the matter not being
ascertainable is concerned, it transpires from the copy
of the plaint, which is annexed to CAN 1 of 2026, that
the valuation has been correctly depicted in the
memorandum of appeal. Hence, it is deemed that such
defect stands cured.
2. The certified copies of the trial court’s judgment and
decree are filed by learned counsel for the appellant in
Court today, which are tagged with the record.
3. Thus, the defect in that regard also stands cured.
4. Leave is granted to the learned Advocate-on-record for
the appellant to carry out the necessary amendments
to the memorandum of appeal to cure the other defects
pointed out by the Additional Stamp Reporter.
##PAGE2##2
5. The present appeal has been preferred against a
judgment of reversal.
6. The suit was filed by the plaintiff/respondent for eviction
of the defendant/appellant.
7. The learned trial Judge proceeded to dismiss the suit
by holding that although the defendant had admitted
the plaintiff as his landlord, no document regarding
ownership was produced by the plaintiff in respect of
the subject property. It was further held that merely
with the service of eviction notice upon the defendant
by the plaintiff being proved and admission on the part
of the defendant regarding the plaintiff being his
landlord, the relief sought by the plaintiff cannot be
granted.
8. The learned trial Judge also framed issues on whether
the defendant/appellant was guilty of default in
payment of rent and/or whether the plaintiff had
personal requirement for the suit property, proceeding
on the premise that the suit was instituted under the
West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997.
9. The learned First Appellate Court reversed the findings
of the learned trial Judge on the premise that since the
suit property did not come within the Kolkata Municipal
Corporation area or the Howrah Municipal Corporation
area and/or any other Municipal area, in terms of the
West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, the said Act
was not applicable.
##PAGE3##3
10. By default, the learned First Appellate Court held that
the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was applicable.
11. On a perusal of the plaint annexed to the injunction
application filed in connection with the present appeal,
we find that the suit was preceded by an ejectment
notice, which was described to be under Section 106 of
the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and mentioned to be
so in paragraph no. 3 of the plaint itself.
12. From the frame of the suit, it is evident that the same
was filed under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, on
the strength of Section 106 of the same, and not under
the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997.
13. The learned trial Judge proceeded on the palpably
erroneous legal premise that the subject property, as
well as the suit, was governed by the 1997 Act.
14. Moreover, the learned trial Judge, after holding that the
defendant/appellant had admitted that the
plaintiff/respondent was his landlord/lessor, had no
other option but to grant eviction, since it was also held
by the learned trial Judge that the service of the
eviction notice, which was issued under Section 106 of
the 1882 Act, was proved.
15. Thus, the learned First Appellate Court rightly reversed
the decision of the trial Court and granted eviction
decree on the ground of Section 106 of the Transfer of
Property Act, 1882.
16. Hence, we do not find any illegality in the impugned
judgment and decree of the First Appellate Court.
##PAGE4##4
17. Accordingly, SAT No. 26 of 2026 is dismissed under
Order XLI Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
18. Consequentially, CAN 1 of 2026 is dismissed as well.
19. There will be no order as to costs.
(Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.) (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.