SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 3388

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
MADAN CHANDRA HALDER – Appellant
Versus
ALOKE RANJAN AICH BHOWMICK – Respondent


D/L.7.

May 20, 2026.

.

MNS SAT No. 26 of 2026 +

CAN 1 of 2026 Madan Chandra Halder Vs.

Aloke Ranjan Aich Bhowmick Md. Mokaram Hossain, Mr. Mizanur Rahaman, Mr. Karnab Biswas, Advs.

… for the appellant. Mr. Prasanta Bishal …for the respondent.

1. Insofar as the report of the Additional Stamp Reporter regarding the valuation of the matter not being ascertainable is concerned, it transpires from the copy of the plaint, which is annexed to CAN 1 of 2026, that the valuation has been correctly depicted in the memorandum of appeal. Hence, it is deemed that such defect stands cured.

2. The certified copies of the trial court’s judgment and decree are filed by learned counsel for the appellant in Court today, which are tagged with the record.

3. Thus, the defect in that regard also stands cured.

4. Leave is granted to the learned Advocate-on-record for the appellant to carry out the necessary amendments to the memorandum of appeal to cure the other defects pointed out by the Additional Stamp Reporter.

5. The present appeal has been preferred against a judgment of reversal.

6. The suit was filed by the plaintiff/respondent for eviction of the defendant/appellant.

7. The learned trial Judge proceeded to d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top