SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 3425

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
HISABUDDIN SK – Appellant
Versus
MURSHED ALI SEIKH @ MURSID SEIKH AND ORS – Respondent


Form No.J(2)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate Side Present : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya &

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury FMA No. 1715 of 2025 Hisabuddin Sk.

Vs.

Murshed Ali Seikh alias Mursid Seikh and others For the appellant : Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, Mr. Sarbananda Sanyal, Ms. Poulami Chakraborty, Advs.

For the respondent nos. 1 and 2. : Mr. Manas Kumar Das, Mr. Prabal Das, Advs.

For the respondent nos. 3 to 30. : Mr. Sudip Das, Mr. Asraf Mondal, Advs.

Heard on : May 19, 2026. Judgment on : May 19, 2026. Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.:

1. The present challenge has been preferred against the grant of ad interim injunction in a partition suit instituted by the plaintiffs/respondents.

2. Learned counsel appearing for defendant no. 1/appellant argues that the vendors of the parties had sold demarcated portions of the original plot.

3. At least insofar as the present defendant no. 1/appellant is concerned, it is submitted that by a transfer deed, a specific portion of the property was transferred to the appellant.

4. In terms of the said allocation, the appellant, it is submitted, has been making construction on the suit propert

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top