Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Krishna Rao, J
Sreeparna Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts regarding student withdrawal from a dental course and institutional refusal to return documents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 21) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding the validity of discontinuity bonds versus ugc fee refund guidelines. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 15) |
| 3. court's ruling that ugc guidelines are mandatory and withholding certificates to enforce bonds violates public policy. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
Krishna Rao, J.:
1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition praying for a direction upon the respondent no. 5 to return all original documents and Rs. 9,50,000/- to the petitioner as she is not willing to continue with her course in the respondent no. 5 college.
2. The petitioner after completion of her BDS Course from Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences had appeared for the NEET MDS to pursue her higher studies and her rank was 8478. In the third round of counseling, she got admission in the Haldia Institute of Dental Sciences and Research (HIDSAR) to pursue her MDS course in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The petitioner was informed by the respondent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
