IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ABC – Appellant
Versus
State Of West Bengal – Respondent
CRA (DB) 183 OF 2024
##PAGE1##
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
CRA (DB) 183 OF 2024
Vs.
The State of West Bengal
With CRA 538 of 2017
& Anr.
Vs.
The State of West Bengal
Before: The Hon’ble Justice Arijit Banerjee
&
The Hon’ble Justice Apurba Sinha Ray
For the Appellants : Mr. Avishek Sinha, Adv.
M s. Madhusree Banerjee, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Debasish Roy, Ld. P.P.,
Ms. Sreyashee Biswas, Adv.
M s. Nandini Chatterjee, Adv.
Reserved on : 06.04.2026
Judgment on : 02.07.2026
Apurba Sinha Ray, J.
1. By this common judgment CRA (DB) 183 of 2024 and CRA 538 of
2017 are hereby disposed of for the sake of convenience and brevity.
Both the appeals challenged the judgment and order dated
13.06.2017 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions
Judge, 2 Court, Uluberia in Sessions Trial No. 64U of 2015 whereby
nd
the appellants were convicted under Section 498A/ 304B/34 of IPC
##PAGE2##and whereas the appellant was sentenced to suffer
rigorous imprisonment for life under Section 304B/34 IPC along with
other sentences, the appellants namely and
, parents-in-law of the victim, were sentenced to suffer
rigorous imprisonment for 7 years alongwith fine.
2. The facts of the case are that married the deceased
on 24.04.2010. At the time of marriage, gold ornaments,
cash and household articles were allegedly given from the side of the
bride. After marriage, the couple started residing together in the
matrimonial home and a girl child was born out of the wedlock.
According to the prosecution, after some time the appellant and
his family members started demanding further money and subjected
the deceased to physical and mental torture. The prosecution case
further states that the deceased used to request her brother to sell
their ancestral property and give her share of the proceeds. It appears
from the evidence that on earlier occasions portions of the ancestral
property were sold and the sale proceeds were shared between the
deceased and her brother. On 23.06.2014, the brother of the deceased
allegedly received information over the telephone regarding the
incident. He went to the matrimonial house and found the deceased
and her minor daughter hanging from the ceiling in dead condition.
Thereafter, on 25.06.2014, Uluberia Police Station Case No. 479 of
2014 was registered under Sections 498A/302/304B/34 of the Indian
Penal Code against the appellant and his parents on the complaint of
the elder brother of the deceased. was arrested on
Page 2 of 13
##PAGE3##26.06.2014 and his parents were arrested on 28.06.2014. Upon
completion of investigation, a charge sheet was submitted under
Sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and
4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During the trial, the prosecution
examined fifteen witnesses. The defence case was one of complete
denial and false implication. The defence specifically relied upon a
suicide note allegedly written by the deceased, wherein the appellant
and his family members were exonerated from responsibility. The
handwriting expert also opined that the handwriting in the suicide
note matched with the admitted handwriting of the deceased. The
Learned Trial Court acquitted the accused persons from the charge
under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code but convicted the
appellant and his parents under Sections 498A/34 and 304B/34 of
the Indian Penal Code. The appellant, was sentenced to suffer
rigorous imprisonment for life under Section 304B/34 IPC and other
appellants for rigorous imprisonment for 7 years along with other
sentences. Being aggrieved by the said judgment and order of
conviction and sentence, the above appeals were preferred before this
Court on different dates.
3. The husband filed CRA (DB) 183 of 2024 challenging the
judgment and order of sentence, and his parents preferred CRA 538 of
2017 challenging the relevant order of conviction and sentence as
aforesaid.
4. Mr. Sinha, learned Counsel for the appellant, has
submitted that the Learned Trial Court failed to appreciate the
Page 3 of 13
##PAGE4##evidence on record
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.