CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Justice Ranjit More, CJ, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, J
K Dhanalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
M/o Personnel public Grievances And Pensions – Respondent
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):
By way of the present OA filed under section 19 of the AT Act, 1985, as per para 8 of the OA, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: -
“(a). For quashing the Memorandum No. F No. 106/03/2018-AVD 1/C dated 14.06.2019 issued by the Respondent No. 2 issued with the approval of the Respondent no. 1 being violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and therefore is arbitrary; and (b) direct the respondents not to further harass the applicant”
FACTS IN BRIEF:
2. The brief facts of this case are that the applicant is an Indian Administrative Service Officer of Uttar Pradesh cadre and belongs to 2000 batch. She hails from Bangalore and states that her grandparents were having large tracts of agricultural land and derived substantial income from business and rental from houses and fair price shops situated in Urban areas of Bangalore. Independently, the applicant’s late father had hereditary properties in various parts of Bangalore and surrounding areas, including more than 15 acres of agricultural land on Mysore Road, Bangalore. He also had the business of transport and real estate and was getting rental incomes from immovabl
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.