SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 910

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rachna Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Education Deptt. Ut Chandigarh – Respondent


O R D E R(Oral)

Per: SURESH KUMAR BATRA, MEMBER (J):

1. The applicant has filed instant O.A under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking following relief: i. Declare the action of respondents in not sanctioning to applicant Child Care Leave w.e.f. 20.2.2025 to 20.3.2025 (29 days) in respect of her Daughter (Ms. Neer) studying in Class IX in Sacred Heart Senior Secondary School, Sector 26, Chandigarh and Son (Vansh Garg) who is in St. Anne’s Convent School, Sector 32, Chandigarh, which is likely to be rejected as was done by the respondent in 2022 on the ground that it is not covered by instructions dated 29.2.2016 which is violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, against legitimate expectations and cannot be sustained in the eyes of law.

ii. Issue direction to the respondents to grant the applicant Child Care Leave w.e.f. 20.2.2025 to 20.3.2025 (29 days) in respect of her Daughter (Ms. Neer) studying in Class IX in Sacred Heart Senior Secondary School, Sector 26, Chandigarh and Son (Vansh Garg) who is in St. Anne’s Convent School, Sector 32, Chandigarh.“

2. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top