Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MR. RAJINDER SINGH DOGRA, J, MR. RAM MOHAN JOHRI, A
Sham Lal – Appellant
Versus
D/o Civil Secretariat J& K – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims promotion (Para 4) |
| 2. respondents deny similar circumstances (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. petitioner's long service acknowledged (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. promotion of respondent no. 6 (Para 9) |
| 5. non-conduct of tests not valid (Para 10) |
| 6. retirement does not preclude relief (Para 11) |
| 7. petitioner's appointment confirmed (Para 12) |
| 8. respondent no. 6's status undisturbed (Para 13) |
| 9. discriminatory treatment established (Para 14) |
| 10. respondents directed to promote (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
1. The SWP/WP(C) No. 2087/2010 was transferred from the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu and was registered as T.A. No. 61/4458/2020 by the Registry of this Tribunal.
2. The present matter was filed before the Hon’ble High Court with following prayer:
a) “Allow this writ petition of the petitioner.
b) Issue Writ of Mandamus commanding the respondents to accord the benefit of promotion to the petitioner as D.T.P. Operator in the pay scale of 9300-34800+4200. Further direct the respondents to accord parity to the petitioner for the purpose of promotion in the aforesaid grade as has been done in case of proforma respondent No.6
c) Pass such ot
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
