Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Om Prakash VII, J, Mr. Mohan Pyare, A
Satish Chand – Appellant
Versus
Shri Ravindra Goel – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of non-compliance with tribunal order. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents claim compliance with directives. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. emphasis on adherence to tribunal orders. (Para 7) |
| 4. closure of contempt proceedings with a revival option. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
(Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (J)
1. Shri Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Rajni Kant Rai, learned counsel for the respondents, are present.
2. The instant contempt petition vide no. 104 of 2024 was filed by the petitioners alleging willful disobedience and non-compliance of the order dated 06.11.2023 passed by this Tribunal in Original Application No. 245 of 2016.
3. Referring to the contents of the contempt petition, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the subject OA was allowed in favour of the applicants and the respondents were directed to extend the benefit of 55% elements in retiral benefits / pension in the running allowance which would enhance pension and other retiral dues, which shall be paid to the applicant from the date of their retirement. To complete the exercise, a time of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
