SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 94

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, J
Sh Sudhir Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Employees State Insurance Corporation (esic) – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr.Somnath Bhattacharya, Mr.Amit Chawla

O R D E R

By Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A): -

The applicant has filed present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, seeking the following relief(s): -

“(i) Allow the O.A and Quash and Set aside the impugned transfer policy dated 20.05.2022.

(ii) Quash and set aside the impugned speaking order dated 27.11.2024 and Transfer Order No. 35 OF 2024 dated 03.03.2024 passed by the authority, competent,оп the Recommendation of Transfer Committee only in respects of the Applicant in which Applicant name is present at S.No. 635 and has been transferred from ESIC Delhi to ESIC Mumbai (Approximate-1500Kms) and consequently pass an order allowing the applicant to serve at the present station.

(iii) Issue an appropriate direction or order for quashing Relieving Order dated 03.12.2024 having an Office Order No. 119 OF 2024 issued by the Deputy Director only in respect of the applicant with all consequential relief.

iii) Pass any further order as this Hon'ble Tribunal seems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2. The factual matrix of the present case is that in pursuance of transfer policy dated 20.05.2022, the applicant has been transfe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top