O R D E R (O R A L)

Hon’ble Mr. D.S. MAHRA, M[J]

1. Learned Counsel for both the parties are present.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant was working in the respondent’s department on the posts of Assistant Lineman, and the respondents had extended the benefit of pay revision in terms of SRO 59 dated 06.02.1990, in his favour. The applicant retired from his services and his case for grant of pension and other retiral benefits was forwarded to the respondents’ No. 1 and 2. However, the said respondents without any authority and jurisdiction had released the pensionery benefits while excluding the benefits of pay revision given to him in lieu of SRO 59 dated 06.02.1990. The learned Counsel for the applicant has submitted that in the identical matters, Central Administrative Tribunal Jammu Bench, directed the respondents not to recover any amount from the applicants and to pay the retiral benefits in their favour granted in terms of SRO 59 dated 06.02.1990. He has further submitted that this Tribunal in the similarly situated matter bearing OA No. 592/2023, titled “Mehraj-ud- Din and ors VS UT of J&K & ors” decided on 27.09.2024, had also directed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document