CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mrs. Pratima K. Gupta, J, Dr. Chhabilendra Roul, A
Delhi State Contractual Employees’ Association – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
O.A./3837/2024 | M.A./4445/2024 | O.A./3841/2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of contractual employees' claims. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of the issues and policies. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's decision based on legal precedents. (Para 9) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Dr. Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A)
1. The Delhi State Contractual Employees Association filed WP(C) No.12117/2023 and Cheriyan Podipaara Chacko & others filed WP(C) 11891/2023 and Ajay Kumar & Others filed WP (C) 12669/2023 before the Delhi High Court in 2023 seeking issuance of a Writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the impugned circular dated /order dated 24.08.2023 issued by the Deputy Secretary, HR- Paramedical Branch and the Advertisement dated 31.07.2023 and OM dated 11.10.2020 as unjustified, arbitrary, discriminatory and unsustainable in the eyes of law.
1.1 Vide order dated 6.09.2024 in WPC No. 12117/2023 and WPC No. 12669/2023 and CM Application No.49932/2023, the Hon’ble High Court passed the following order:
“Ordinarily, the Court would have directed the Petitioners to withdraw these petitions and approach the Tribunal afresh. However, considering that these writ petitions have been pending before this Court for some time, it would be unfair to direct the Petitioners to file fresh applications and therefore, these writ petitions are transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal, where they shall be listed before the learned Registrar on 03.10.2024.”
The WPCs were converted into OA No.3837 of 2024. Subsequently, Ajay Kumar and others filed OA no. 3841/2024 seeking the following relief:
“A) issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any appropriate Writ, order or direction setting aside the impugned O.M. No. F.8/279/H&W/Nursing/2016/1463339 dated 11.10.2020 issued by Dy. Secretary (HR-Nursing) of Health & Family Welfare Department with the approval of the respondent no.2, the advertisement dated 31.07.2023 issued by the respondent no.4 and the impugned circular/order No. Fl (1036) HR- PARA/H&FW/2023/2969-3009 dated 24.08.2023 issued by the Deputy Secretary of HR-PARAMEDICAL Branch with approval of the respondent no.2, all being erroneous, unjustified, arbitrary, discriminatory, and unsustainable in the eyes of law;
(B) issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction, thereby directing the Respondents no. 1 and 2 to declare the petitioner employees as deemed "Regular Appointees/Employees" and consider them for confirmation on the respective posts as held by them since last more than 10 years, on the basis of their service record with all consequential benefits, thereto;
(C) pass any further order/orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
1.2 As the issue in both the OAs are same and the applicants in both OAs have basically challenged the OM dated 11.10.2020 vide which the respondents are issuing advertisements for fresh recruitment, the OAs are decided together. With the agreement of the parties, OA No. 3837/2024 is taken as the lead case.
2. Factual Matrix
2.1 The present OA has been filed by the Delhi State Contractual Employees Association. The applicants were employed as para medical staff on contractual basis between 1998 and 2013 at various hospitals, pursuant to an advertisement notification issued by the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD). One such notification is at page 32 of the OA, issued by the Medical Superintendent, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, Delhi. The applicants, considering themselves eligible applied for the said position against regular vacancies. Having been appointed, they have continued to serve on a contractual basis to date. There are two sets of identically placed persons, who had approached this Tribunal in 2002 and 2003. Their cases were decided on 27.09.2002 and 14.11.2003, respectively. A review petition preferred by the respondents was dismissed. The respondents challenged the orders passed by the Tribunal bef
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.