SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 779

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Tejveer Singh – Appellant
Versus
Railway – Respondent


ORDER (ORAL)

By Hon’ble Ms. Pratima K Gupta, Member (J):

The brief facts of the OA as explained by learned counsel for applicant are that the applicant, who is working as Shunting Master with the Indian Railways, is suffering from „Mental Tuberculosis‟ and his medical condition does not allow him to perform the duties assigned to him. Therefore, he preferred representation dated 09.08.2023 to the respondents to consider him extending light duties. His representation has been rejected by the respondents vide impugned order dated 17.08.2023. Being aggrieved he has preferred the present OA seeking the following reliefs:-

“(i) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may further graciously be pleased to pass an order of quashing the impugned order dated 17.08.2023 (Annexure A/1) declaring to the effect that the same is illegal, arbitrary and against the advice of the competent medical authorities and consequently, pass an order directing the respondents to consider and to post the applicant on night duty without involving train operation and safety of the public.

(ii) That the Hon’ble Tribunal may further graciously be pleased to pass an order directing the respondents to constitute the medical board for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top