SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 719

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Justice Ranjit More, CJ, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, J
Mukul Sanwal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. R. K. Jain, Advocate

ORDER

Justice Ranjit More, Chairman :

The applicant, by filing present Original Application, has sought following relief:

“(i) Set aside Order No.22012/04/2018-IAS-III dated 12.04.2023 as bad in law,

(ii) Direct Respondent to pay the full amount of pension of Applicant due under the Rules from the date of foreign assignment (03.12.1993) with applicable interest, as the right had not been denied under Ryle 5(1) AIS (DCRB) Rules, in accordance with a time frame determined by the Tribunal.”

2. Undisputed facts which gave rise to this Application are as follows:

2.1 The applicant was an IAS officer of 1971 batch borne in the cadre of Uttar Pradesh. He was granted permission to take up a foreign assignment with the United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, from 03.12.1993 to 02.11.1994, which was subsequently extended up to 30.06.1995. Since no further extension was granted thereafter, the applicant was required to report for duty in his parent cadre, but he did not report for duty. Thus, the applicant remained unauthorizedly absent from duty with effect from 01.07.1995.

2.2 The respondent vide letters dated 22.08.1997 and 24.12.1997 informed the applicant that his request for continuance

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top