SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 766

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. R.N. Singh, J, Mr. B. Anand, A
Dr Arshad Ahamed – Appellant
Versus
Aiims – Respondent
O.A./1341/2024



Advocates:
Ms. Nitya Ramakrishnan, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Achit Krishna and Ms. Stuti Rai, counsel for applicant; Mr. Satya Ranjan Swain with Mr. Kautilya Biran

The inquiry against the applicant was invalid due to non-compliance with CCS(CCA) Rules, leading to the setting aside of his dismissal and blacklisting.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Prevention of Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Act, 2013 - Inquiry proceedings vitiated due to non-compliance with CCS(CCA) Rules - The applicant, a Junior Resident at AIIMS, was dismissed based on findings of sexual harassment without following proper procedures as mandated by CCS(CCA) Rules. The Tribunal found that the ICCSHWW did not adhere to the required disciplinary procedures, leading to the dismissal being set aside. (Paras 15-17)

(B) Inquiry Procedures - The inquiry conducted by the ICCSHWW was deemed invalid as it did not comply with the procedural safeguards outlined in the CCS(CCA) Rules, particularly regarding the rights of the accused to be informed of charges and evidence. (Paras 14-15)

Facts of the case:
The applicant was accused of sexual harassment by a patient, leading to an inquiry by the ICCSHWW, which resulted in his dismissal and blacklisting from AIIMS. The applicant contested the validity of the inquiry and the dismissal order.

Findings of Court:
The Tribunal concluded that the inquiry was improperly conducted, violating the CCS(CCA) Rules, and thus set aside the dismissal and blacklisting orders.

Issues: The main issues included whether the inquiry followed proper procedures and whether the dismissal was justified under the applicable rules.

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal ruled that the ICCSHWW's failure to adhere to CCS(CCA) Rules rendered the inquiry and subsequent dismissal invalid, emphasizing the necessity of following established procedures in disciplinary matters.

Result: The order of dismissal and blacklisting was set aside, and the applicant was permitted to register for his examinations.

ORDER

Hon’ble Mr. B.Anand, Member (A):

In the present O.A. filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicant has sought the following reliefs:-

“a) Set aside the order of dismissal and blacklisting dated 05.07.2023 passed by Respondent no.1 in terms of the recommendations in the report of Respondent no.2 (ICC) dated 20.06.2023 as vitiated both by procedure and on merits.

b) Call for the record of the enquiry conducted by the Respondent no.2 (ICCSHW) on the complaint dated 22.03.2023, which culminated in the ICCHWS’s findings and report dated 20.06.2023.

c) Set aside the report of the ICC dated 20.06.2023 with its findings as well its recommendations be set aside as vitiated both by procedure and on merits.

d) Pass any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Tribunal thinks fit and proper in the light of the facts and circumstances of the present case.

e) Direct costs of this litigation to be paid to the Applicant by the Respondents.”

2. In addition, the applicant has also sought for the following interim reliefs:-

“a) Permit the release of the applicant’s final MS examination results based on which he can start applying for job opportunities.”

3. The brief factual matrix of the case is that the applicant, while working as a Doctor [Junior Resident (Academic)] in the Department of Orthopaedics of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), had allegedly examined a lady patient, inside the consultation room, when the said lady patient was not accompanied by any other relatives or other persons as contemplated in the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for conducting such examination in AIIMS. On 22.03.2023, the said lady patient filed a complaint against the applicant alleging that the applicant had attempted to molest the lady patient with the authorities of AIIMS and also filed a police complaint on the same day (22.03.2023) in the Hauz Khas Police Station (P.S.), which she had subsequently withdrawn according to the General Diary No. 74A at the P.S. The said complaint by the lady patient was referred to the Internal Complaint Committee for Sexual Harassment of Women at the Workplace (ICCSHWW) constituted by the AIIMS for inquiring into the allegations of sexual misconduct under Prevention of Sexual Harassment at the Workplace Act 2013 (the POSH Act, for short). After conducting inquiry, the ICCSH had given inquiry report dated 20.06.2023 wherein the Committee had concluded as under:-

“1. The accused is guilty of sexual harassment of patient at work place.

2. The accused is guilty of stating wrong facts pertaining to the case and tarnishing the image of the institute.

3. The accused is guilty of creating false evidence to protect himself, being in position of power.

Suggestion:

1. The accused to be immediately removed from the institute.

2. A recorded warning should be given with directions not to approach the patient/witness concerned with the case in future himself or through colleagues etc. if found doing so, strict administrative action with police reporting shall be done by the institute.

3. The accused to be blacklisted from availing any further job opportunities at AIIMS.

4. Protection to be provided to the witness in terms of safe and secure environment at workplace by the Deptt. of Orthopaedics and the institute.

4. Based on the recommendations of the ICCSHWW, the respondent no.1 had passed an order dated 05.07.2023 whereby the applicant’s registration for appearing in the final examination of MS Orthopaedics was cancelled and his services as a Doctor Junior Resident (Academic) was terminated with immediate effect. Aggrieved by the said order terminating his services from the respondent organization – AIIMS and also cancelling his registration in MS Orthopaedics exam, the applicant filed OA No. 3672/2023 under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following reliefs under Paras 8 and 9 thereof:-

“a) Pass directions to the respondents to permit the applicant herein to regist

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top