2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 57
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Rajnish Kumar Rai, J
Sanjeev Kumar – Appellant
Versus
North Eastern Railway – Respondent
M.A./3012/2023
Compassionate appointment claims must be filed promptly; excessive delays undermine the scheme's purpose and can lead to dismissal.
Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 and Section 21 - Compassionate appointment - Applicant sought compassionate appointment 20 years post the death of his father, citing financial distress - Delay condonation application rejected due to lack of cogent reasons for the protracted delay - The scheme aims to provide immediate relief to bereaved families, which is frustrated by such delay. (Paras 1-10)
(B) Delay Condonation - The Tribunal emphasized that applications for compassionate appointment must be timely to maintain the scheme's purpose, and prolonged delay diminishes the sense of urgency required. (Paras 8-9)
Facts of the case:
The applicant's father passed away on 22.10.2003, leaving behind two widows and four children. The applicant sought compassionate appointment after 20 years, citing disputes over legal dues and financial hardship. (Paras 1-3)
Findings of Court:
The Tribunal held that the applicant's delay in seeking relief undermined the objective of compassionate appointments, leading to the rejection of both the delay condonation application and the original application. (Paras 9-10)
Issues: The main issues included the applicant's substantial delay in filing for compassionate appointment and whether the delay could be condoned under the Administrative Tribunals Act. (Paras 6-7)
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the purpose of compassionate appointments is to provide immediate assistance, which is negated by excessive delays; thus, the application was dismissed. (Paras 8-10)
Result: Delay condonation application and original application dismissed.
O R D E R
By way of the present O.A., the applicant has sought the relief for compassionate appointment on the ground that his father Late Ramanand Singh died on 22.10.2003. The O.A. is supported by Misc. Application No. 3012/2023 i.e. Delay Condonation MANISH Application explaining the delay and laches in filing the O.A. The relief sought under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 is quoted below: -
“(ii) To issue an order or direction in the suitable nature directing the respondent department to consider the appointment of applicant on compassionate ground under the dying-in-harness rules within stipulated period of time which may be specified by this Hon’ble Tribunal.
(iii) To issue any order or direction, which this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
(iv) To award the cost to the application to the applicant.”
2. This case is reserved for orders on delay condonation application (M.A. No. 3012/2023).
3. The brief facts of the case, as per pleadings, is that the father of applicant expired on 22.10.2003 during service career leaving behind him two widows namely Smt. Ahilya Devi and Smt. Renu Devi along with four children. The deceased employee married two times, firstly with Smt. Ahilya Devi and thereafter with Smt. Renu Devi with the consent of first wife Smt. Ahilya Devi because she was unable to born child. The applicant is the one of legitimate child of the deceased employee who born from the wedlock of second wife Smt. Renu Devi. Before death of deceased employee, Smt. Ahilya Devi (first wife) was living in the parental house of the deceased employee at Begusarai, whereas Smt. Renu Devi (second wife) living with deceased employee at Bareilly City. After the death of deceased employee, Smt. Renu Devi approached in the office of respondent department vide application dated 07.01.2012 and requested for release of death-cum-retiral dues of her husband as per rules. Since the respondents department did not release the death-cum-settlement dues of the deceased employee on the
4. The respondents have filed the objection against the delay condonation application stating therein that during t