Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Judicial Member, Anindo Majumdar, Administrative Member
Kartik Chandra Dhar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. suspension facts and revocation history. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. respondents justify under fr 54-b(5) citing technical acquittal. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. applicant relies on acquittal cases for full pay. (Para 6) |
| 4. fr 54-b governs; impugned order harsh, pre-determined. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. no proceedings initiated; re-examine under fr 54-b justly. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
ORDER (Oral)
Per Mr. Manish Garg, JM:
The applicant has filed this O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:
“(a) To quash and set aside the Impugned Order dated being No. FD/BB/Asstt. /K.C. Dhar/PA/07-08 dated 24.08.2022 issued by Senior Postmaster, Barabazar Head Post Office, Kolkata- 700007.
(b) To quash and set aside the Order dated 24.05.2016 issued by the Deputy Chief Postmaster, Barabazar HPO, Kolkata- 700007.
(c ) To pass an appropriate order directing the respondent authority to treat the period of suspension as on duty for all purposes including the benefit of regular promotion of such period and also release his all arrear salary and difference of subsistence allowance and all other consequential monetary benefits along with statutory interest.
(d) An order d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
