Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Member(A)
K. Suresh – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India represented by the Secretary to Government, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, Department of Personnel & Training North Block, New Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and factual background of case (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. validity of disciplinary proceedings post-retirement (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. service of charge sheet efficacy arguments (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. counterclaims and responses from the applicant (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. interpretation of charge sheet issuance (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. allegations of misconduct and timeframe concerns (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. legal principles established on notifications and service (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. legality regarding time-bar of disciplinary proceedings (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 9. final evaluative conclusions from the court (Para 24 , 25 , 27) |
| 10. concluding remarks on proceeding and benefits (Para 26 , 28 , 29) |
ORDER
(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Member(A))
OA.No.954 of 2016 and OA.No.1080 of 2018 have been filed by one Shri K. Suresh. In OA 954 of 2016, the applicant has challenged the Charge Memo, dated 26.08.2015, and prayed for grant of retirement benefits with interest, by quashing the said Charge Memo. In OA 1080 of 2018, he has prayed for quashing of the inquiry proceedings initiated against him in Ref. No.001/Inquiry/2018, dated 11.04.2018, pursuant to the Charge Memo, d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
