CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Dr. Anand S. Khati, A, Mr. Manish Garg, J
Surender Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER
By Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
The present Original Application (O.A.) has been filed by the applicant, who is a pre-1996 pensioner, seeking the following reliefs:
“8.1 declare the impugned order dated 31/5/2016 (ANNEXURE-A1) as wrong, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unfair, unjust, unreasonable, violative of Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India and of Govt. Resolutions, notifications, orders etc., issued for implementation of 6th pay commission report whereunder revised pension/ family pension w.e.f. 1/1/2006 was authorized in favour of the Applicant by taking into account wrong grade pay of Rs. 4200/- p.m. (instead of Rs. 4800/-p.m. admissible) in PB-2, Rs. 9300-34800 and quash/set aside the said impugned order dated 31/5/2016 (ΑΝNEXURE-A1), and
8.2 order/direct the respondents to issue fresh/revised pension revision authority in favour of the Applicant authorizing pension and family pension w.e.f. 1/1/2006 after taking into account correct/ admissible amount of Grade pay of Rs. 4800/- p.m. in PB-2 i.e. Rs. 9300-34800 in terms of OM dated 6/4/16 (ANNEXURE-A/23) which revision of pension was also earlier due in terms of DP &PW OM dated 30/7/15 (ANNEXURE-A/

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.