Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash, Member (Judicial), Mohan Pyare, Member (Administrative)
Jitendra Kumar Saini – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through General Manager – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of recruitment applicants and context of postings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. claims of applicants relating to arbitrary appointments. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. legal conclusions and assessments on recruitment process. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. court's justification for administrative discretion. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
ORDER
(Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash VII, Member (J)
Shri Rakesh Verma, learned counsel for the applicants in all the above cases and Shri Bablu Singh, Shri Ram Chandra Sahu and Shri Subhash Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents in their respective cases, were present at the time of hearing. All the cases have been heard together and therefore they are being decided by way of a common judgment. OA No. 1343 of 2013 is being treated as the leading case.
2. Initiating his arguments, Shri Rakesh Verma who is counsel for the applicants in all the cases, argued that inviting applications for recruitment on certain posts under Group D category, the Railway Board issued a Circular No. 121/2005 on 18.07.2005 laying down the procedure for recruitment. The said Circular stipulated that recruitment to all Group D posts will be
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
