Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ranjana Shahi, Judicial Member, Lok Ranjan, Administrative Member
Dr. Parimi Suresh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants seek superannuation extension to 65 years per ayush order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. autonomous status excludes institute from ministry superannuation benefit. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 12) |
| 3. cited cases distinguished; no parity for autonomous employees. (Para 10 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. no salary for non-worked period; applications dismissed. (Para 11 , 13 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
ORDER
Per: RANJANA SHAHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
At the request of learned counsels for the parties, OA No. 63/2018, OA No. 334/2018, OA No. 335/2018 and OA No. 421/2019 with MA No. 651/2019 are taken up together for disposal as common question of law and facts is involved in the aforesaid matters/OAs.
2. For the sake of convenience, brief facts of OA No. 63/2018 are taken up. The relief sought for by the applicant in the said OA is as under: -
i) to declare the impugned order dated 16.01.2017 (Annex. A/1) to be illegal and unconstitutional and the same may kindly be quashed and set aside qua the applicant.
ii) to declare the action of the respondents in not extending the benefit of order dated 24.11.2017 issued by the Ministry of AYUSH to the faculty of National Institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur as illeg
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
