Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Dr. Anand S. Khati, A
Surender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through The General Manager North Western Railway Jaipur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's request for retirement benefit corrections was raised. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondents counter the applicant's requests, asserting correctness of their actions. (Para 3) |
| 3. court emphasizes the requirement to adhere to prior tribunal orders in service evaluations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. decision of the tribunal allows the o.a. providing direction for benefit assessment. (Para 12) |
| 5. final ruling included no costs directed. (Para 13) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
The grievance of the applicant in the present O.A. is that the respondents have not considered his request for fixation of retirement benefits after counting correct years of regular service and also not granted two financial upgradations after counting 50% temporary status service as per the undertaking given before the Tribunal in O.A. No.337/2012.
2. Briefly stated, the applicant was initially appointed as Khallasi on casual basis w.e.f. 11.11.1977 and, thereafter, he was disengaged on completion of work. He was re-engaged on 20.08.1981 and further disengaged on 01.10.1983. Challenging the same, the applicant filed O.A. No. 2242/1990 which was allowed by this Tribunal vide Order da
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
