SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 4845

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
V Sivaraman – Appellant
Versus
M/o Defence – Respondent


ORDER

(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Varun Sindhu Kul Kaumudi, Member(A))

This OA has been filed by the applicants seeking the following relief:-

“a). For quashing of the impugned order Nos 1810/LB/Gen, Labour Bureau, dated 21.07.2014, 23.07.2014, 06.08.2014, 08.09.2014 of the 3rd respondent is illegal and void;

b). For consequential direction to the respondents to grant proper seniority to the applicants in the skilled grade and grant promotion to highly skilled grade effect from 20.05.2003, with attendant benefits like, further promotion to HS Grade-l and Master Craftsman as the case may be, on that basis.

c). For such further or other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. ”

2. The facts of the case, as submitted by the Applicants, are as follows, in brief:-

2.1. The applicants were originally appointed between 1991 and 1993, in the non-industrial establishment in the 3rd respondent factory, (Ordnance Clothing Factory), in various posts like Vendor, Durwan, etc. Since, promotional opportunities were very remote in the non-industrial establishment, they opted for appointment in the industrial establishmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top