Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Judicial Member
Phoola Devi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant seeks quashing of reduced compassionate allowance order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on past conduct relevance for allowance grant. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. railway rules and circulars outline discretionary compassionate allowance procedures. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. precedents require independent assessment beyond misconduct for full allowance. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. impugned order quashed; reconsideration of two-thirds allowance directed. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORDER (ORAL)
In the instant OA, the applicant seeks the following reliefs :
A. Allow the O.A. and quash the impugned order dated 27.03.2020 issued by the Respondents to the extent of grant of compassionate allowance at the rate of one- fourth of Pension;
B. To direct Respondents to sanction compassionate allowance at the rate of two-third of the Pension and Gratuity which would payable to husband of the applicant and award consequential family pension as per Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993;
C. Award arrears and all consequential benefits;
D. Award costs of the proceedings; and E. Pass any order/relief/direction(s) as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem and proper in the interest of justice in favour of the applic
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
