Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Chhabilendra Roul, A
Shubham Lodhi – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi through the Chief Secretary – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conflicting medical reports; no right to re-exam per advertisement, expert opinions final. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. short gap between exams by same hospital defeats review; direct independent re-exam. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. fresh exam in different hospital; appointment if fit with notional benefits. (Para 9) |
ORDER (ORAL)
By Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant relies upon the decision rendered by a co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in OA No.670/2024 decided on 11.03.2024 and sprays for similar order in the present matter. For the sake of brevity, the said order is reproduced as under:-
“At the outset, Shri R V Sinha, who has appeared on behalf of the SSC, states that in view of the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between SSC and Delhi police, the instant OA would be defended by the counsel representing Delhi Police. Accordingly, Learned counsel for Respondents No.2 & 3, Mr. Amit Yadav, shall represent Respondent No. 1, i.e., SSC as well.
2. Factual matrix, as explained by the learned counsel for the applicant, is that the applicant has participated in the recruitment process initiated by the SSC, for the post of Constable (Ex
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
