CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Chandigarh Administration – Respondent
ORDER
Per: SURESH KUMAR BATRA, MEMBER (J):
1. The applicant has preferred instant O.A under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking setting aside of impugned termination orders dated 31.05.2005 (Annexure A-1 and 11.12.2007 (Annexure A-2), whereby the services of applicant has been terminated.
2. The applicant has also preferred instant M.A seeking condonation of 2482 days in filing O.A No.1087/2022. The applicant submits that vide order dated 31.05.2005 (Annexure A-1), respondent No.3 terminated the services of the applicant due to reason that the contract stands terminated qua the retirement/relinquishment or change of the post of Presiding Officer on 31.12.2004. He approached this Tribunal by way of O.A 606/00034/2014 and vide order dated 16.01.2014 the respondents were directed to consider the representation of applicant. The applicant then kept visiting the respondents' office but no decision has been taken by the respondents.
3. The applicant further submits that the delay in filing the O.A is not intentional, but is for bonafide reasons and he will suffer irreparable loss and injustice, if the delay is not condoned, he p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.