SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 1004

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Chandigarh Administration – Respondent


ORDER

Per: SURESH KUMAR BATRA, MEMBER (J):

1. The applicant has preferred instant O.A under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking setting aside of impugned termination orders dated 31.05.2005 (Annexure A-1 and 11.12.2007 (Annexure A-2), whereby the services of applicant has been terminated.

2. The applicant has also preferred instant M.A seeking condonation of 2482 days in filing O.A No.1087/2022. The applicant submits that vide order dated 31.05.2005 (Annexure A-1), respondent No.3 terminated the services of the applicant due to reason that the contract stands terminated qua the retirement/relinquishment or change of the post of Presiding Officer on 31.12.2004. He approached this Tribunal by way of O.A 606/00034/2014 and vide order dated 16.01.2014 the respondents were directed to consider the representation of applicant. The applicant then kept visiting the respondents' office but no decision has been taken by the respondents.

3. The applicant further submits that the delay in filing the O.A is not intentional, but is for bonafide reasons and he will suffer irreparable loss and injustice, if the delay is not condoned, he p


    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top