Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
R.N. Singh, Member (J), Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
Bhagwan – Appellant
Versus
GNCT of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's prolonged absence due to illness and departmental proceedings initiated. (Para 3) |
| 2. applicant's defense: absence not willful, medical evidence ignored. (Para 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 3. respondents: willful absence without intimation despite notices. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. disciplinary and appellate authorities upheld charges, reduced penalty. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. tribunal finds sufficient opportunity provided, dismisses oa. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):-
By way of the present OA filed u/s 19 of the AT Act, 1985, the applicant, in Para 8 of the OA, has prayed for the following reliefs: -
“(a) Quash and set aside impugned orders dated 03/05/2016, Order dated 30/06/2016 and order dated 27/03/2017 (mentioned in Para 1 of the OA), whereby the Applicant was penalized with the penalty of forfeiture of 2 years approved service permanently and his absence period was treated as period not spent on duty. And
(b) Direct the respondents to restore the forfeited service of the Applicant, and is absence period may kindly be treatment as spent on duty of all intention purposes with all consequential benefits viz. seniority, promotion etc. And
(c)
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
