SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5065

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, Judicial Member
Dharmendra Singh Sengar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
O.A. No. 3663/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Alok Kr. Sharma, Mr. Tarun Mehra
For the Respondents: Mr. N.D. Kaushik

Employee entitled to withdraw VRS notice before effective date, but acceptance and prolonged use of retiral benefits bars reinstatement under approbate-reprobate doctrine, severing service relation post-relief.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 48-A - Voluntary retirement - Notice submitted on 02.03.2020 to expire on 10.08.2020 - Acceptance order issued on 13.08.2020 post expiry - Withdrawal request emailed on 14.08.2020 - Relieved on 17.08.2020 - Applicant received all retiral benefits and offered refund - No reasoned order on withdrawal - Tribunal held doctrine of approbate and reprobate applies as acceptance and utilization of benefits disentitles reinstatement despite entitlement to withdraw before effective date, following cited precedents. (Paras 2-11)

(B) Service Law - Withdrawal of voluntary retirement notice - Employee has right to withdraw before acceptance becomes effective if no administrative prejudice, but post-relief and benefit acceptance bars reinstatement on grounds of inconsistent positions. (Paras 4-10)

Facts of the case:
Applicant, a DSP, applied for voluntary retirement citing family health issues, later sought withdrawal before relief. Notice accepted post-notice period expiry; relieved while on leave; received full retiral dues without prompt challenge.

Findings of Court:
Relief denied; OA dismissed observing no respondent fault at belated stage; pending applications dismissed; no costs.

Issues: Whether withdrawal permissible post-acceptance but pre-relief; effect of non-consideration of withdrawal; entitlement to reinstatement after accepting benefits.

Ratio Decidendi: Though withdrawal possible before intended retirement date per precedents, prolonged acceptance and utilization of retiral benefits invokes approbate-reprobate doctrine, disentitling reinstatement; employer-employee relation severed post-relief under Rule 48A.

Result: OA dismissed.

Table of Content
1. timeline of vrs application, acceptance, withdrawal, and relief. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. applicant's right to withdraw vrs; need for reasoned rejection. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. respondents' contention: employment severed post-relief; no withdrawal post-acceptance. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court analysis of precedents on vrs withdrawal and benefits acceptance. (Para 10)
5. doctrine of approbate/reprobate bars reinstatement after benefits. (Para 11)

ORDER

In the instant OA, the applicant seeks the following reliefs :

(i) That, impugned order dated 17.8.2020 of acceptance of VRS and relieving the applicant vide Annexure A/1 may kindly be declared as illegal and the same may kindly be quashed.

(ii) That, respondents may kindly be directed to reinstate the applicant with all consequential benefits. Applicant is ready to refund the amount and benefits received pursuant to acceptance of his VRS.

(iii) Any other suitable relief which this Hon'ble Tribunal deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case may also be given to the applicant along with cost of this litigation.

2. The present case pertains to withdrawal of application for VRS. Narrating the facts of the case, learned counsel for the applicant would state that the application for VRS was submitted on 02.03.2020 stating the following reasons :

Most humbly ii is submitted that currently I am holding the substantive post of Dy. Supdt of Police in CBI at Anti Corruption Branch, New Delhi. I have joined government service in August, 1990 as Sub-Inspector in Madhya Pradesh Police. Subsequently I Joined CBI on deputation as Sub-Inspector in year 1994. Later I was absorbed in CBI as Sub-Inspector in the year 2000. I was promoted to the rank of Inspector in CBI in the year 2003 and further as Dy Supdt. of Police, CBI in the year 2014. Presently I am posted at CBI ACB Delhi branch w.e.f. 17.09.2018.

Sir, my father is of 93 years of age and my wife is suffering persistent depression. (due to many major operations, she has undergone which included uterus removal operations, ovary removal, appendix removal, breast lump removal operations etc) and both needs to be taken care of personally, which I was not able to do as I was posted at Delhi. Due to age factor of my father and nature of disease of my wife, both of them are required to be stationed to Bhopal only.

Since I have to take care of my 93 years father and my wife who is suffering from depression) I have no option but to take voluntarily retirement from service for the above reasons.

Thereafter, an application for withdrawal of VRS was made by way of an e-mail on 14.08.2020. As per the averment of the respondents, the VRS was accepted by Office Order dated 13.08.2020 which reads as under :

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES &

PENSIONS

(DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL AND TRAINING)

AVD-II

********

Subject : Voluntary Retirement from Service (VRS) Notice of Shri D.S. Sengar, DSP, CBI-regarding

CBI may please refer their ID No. DPERS.I/2020/1129/3/119/2014 (793)-Pers.I dated 06.08.2020, on the subject mentioned above.

2. The competent Authority has approved the proposal for acceptance of voluntary retirement from service (VRS) notice dated 02.03.2020 (due to expire on 10.08.2020 after taking into consideration of DOPT OMs dated 30.03.2020 and 05.06.2020 regarding counting of the limitation period for diverse purposes under CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965, CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972) of Shri D.S. Sengar, DSP/CBI requesting for his retirement under Rule 48-A of CCS (Pension) Rule, 1972.

(S.P.R. Tripathi)

Under Secretary to the Government of India

Tel. No. 011-23092285

Dy. Director (Admn.), CBI HO, CGO Complex, New Delhi

DoPT ID No. 202/1/2020-AVD-II(Pt.I)

Dated 13.08.2020

This office order was received by CBI office on 14.08.2024.

3. It is not in dispute that the applicant was relieved by virtue of Annexure A-1 which reads as under :

Central Bureau of Investigation,

Anti Corruption Branch

Office Order No. 335/2020,

Dated : 17/08/2020.

Consequent upon acc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top