Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Manish Garg, J, Anand S. Khati, A
Girish Chandra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant seeks quashing of acp withdrawal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on acp vs macp eligibility. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. respondents defend macp supersession. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. acp right crystallized pre-macp. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. order quashed; acp restored. (Para 9) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J):
In the instant OA, the applicant seeks the following reliefs:-
“(i) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass an order of quashing the impugned order dated 25.4.2018 (Annex.A/1) and consequently, pass an order directing the respondents to consider and to grant the applicant 2nd financial upgradation w.e.f. 19.9.2008 in PB-2+GP 4200/-. in the light of Hon’ble Tribunal Ernakulam Bench judgment dated 24.3.2015 in OA No. 252/2013 in the case of of K.Saman Pillai and others Versus Secretary, Ministry of Defence , New Delhi and Hon’ble Madras High Court judgment in Writ petition No. 33946, 34602 and 27798 of 2014 in the case of Union of India & Ors Versus S.Ranjhit Samuel & Ors, decided on 14.2.2017, with all the consequential benefits including the arrears of difference of pay and allowances with interest @ 18% PA..
(ii) Any other relief which the Hon’ble Tribunal de
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
