SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 4425

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shiv Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
M/o Finance – Respondent


O R D E R (ORAL)

The facts and issues in both the captioned OAs are since common, the grounds urged on behalf of the parties are also common and the reliefs sought by the applicants are similar. In the background of such admitted position and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the captioned OAs are being heard and decided together by the present common order. However, for the sake of convenience, OA No. 2265/2019 has been treated as a lead case and the facts are being taken from the pleadings therein.

2. The applicants are aggrieved by order dated 26.10.2015 (Annexure A-1) whereby the respondents have decided to discontinue the grant of Transport Allowance (TA) to them at Delhi rates while posted at Noida and further decided to reduce the TA as well as recover the alleged excess TA paid from January, 2009 to November, 2015 by an order dated 18.07.2019. Aggrieved by the same, they have filed the present O.As. seeking following relief(s):-

O.A. No. 2477/2019 “ (i) That the Hon‟ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass an order of quashing the impugned order dated 26.10.2015 (Annexure A/1) and orders dated 18.07.2019 (Annexure A/2) (colly), declaring to the eff

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top