Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ranjana Shahi, Judicial Member, Lok Ranjan, Administrative Member
Maheshwar Narayan Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to reservation application in cgl 2013 tiers. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. participation does not bar challenging flawed process. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. no category migration at preliminary short-listing stages. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. direct revision of results; reservation at final stage. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
ORDER
Per: RANJANA SHAHI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
The present Original Application has been filed by the applicants seeking for the following reliefs: -
“(i) To pass appropriate order or direction whereby Result declared by Respondent Staff Selection Commission for Tier-1 Combined Graduate Level Exam, 2013 on 19.8.2014 and 23.8.2014 be quashed and set aside.
(ii) To pass appropriate order or direction whereby results declared by Respondent Staff Selection Commission for Tier-II Combined Graduate Level Exam, 2013 on 31.10.2014 and 19.11.2014 be quashed and set aside.
(iii) To pass appropriate order or direction whereby respondent be directed to revise result of Tier-I and Tier-II of Combined Graduate Level Exam, 2013 and further discriminative norms and standards of providing reservation be quashed and set aside and Applicants be considered fairly for the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
