SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2737

HON’BLE

Shanti Devi wife of Late

(Tineri), Post

By Advocate :

1. The Union of India through

Railway, Hajipur, P.O.

District

2. The General Manager (Personnel), East Central Railway, Hajipur,

P.O.

Hajipur, PIN Code

3. The Div

Khagaul, P.S.

(Bihar).

4. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central Railway,

P.O.

801105

5. The Senior Divisional Engineer (Co

Railway, P.O.

Code

6. The Senior Divisional Financial Manager, East Central Railway,

P.O.

801105 (Bihar).

7. The Assistant Divisional Engineer (Line), East Central Railway,

Patna

8. The Section Engineer (P.Way), East Central Railway, Patna

800001 (Bihar).

By Advocate :

1.

2.

that the issue in this OA involves grant of family pension to the

// 1 //

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

PATNA BENCH, PATNA

O.A. No. 050/00

C O R A M

HON’BLE SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, MEMBER [A]

Shanti Devi wife of Late Keshwar, Resident of Village

(Tineri), Post- Nadaul, District – Patna

By Advocate :- Shri M.P. Dixit

-Versus

The Union of India through the General Manager, East Central

Railway, Hajipur, P.O. – Digghi Kala,

District – Vaishali at Hajipur, PIN Code

The General Manager (Personnel), East Central Railway, Hajipur,

P.O. – Digghi Kala, P.S. – Hajipur (Town), District

Hajipur, PIN Code – 841001 (Bihar).

The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, P.O.

Khagaul, P.S. – Danapur & District

(Bihar).

The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East Central Railway,

P.O. – Khagaul, P.S. – Danapur & District

801105 (Bihar).

The Senior Divisional Engineer (Co

Railway, P.O. – Khagaul, P.S. – Danapur & District

Code – 801105 (Bihar).

The Senior Divisional Financial Manager, East Central Railway,

P.O. – Khagaul, P.S. – Danapur & Di

801105 (Bihar).

The Assistant Divisional Engineer (Line), East Central Railway,

Patna – 800001 (Bihar).

The Section Engineer (P.Way), East Central Railway, Patna

800001 (Bihar).

By Advocate :- Shri A.K. Mantu.

Per Sunil Kr. Sinha, Member [Admn]

The OA is listed for final hearing. Heard.

Learned counsel for applicant Shri M.P. Dixit submits

OA/050/00965/2019

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

PATNA BENCH, PATNA

O.A. No. 050/00965/2019

Date:05th January, 2024

C O R A M

SUNIL KUMAR SINHA, MEMBER [A]

Keshwar, Resident of Village – Gopalpur

Patna-804454 (Bihar).

………. Applicant.

Versus-

the General Manager, East Central

Digghi Kala, P.S. – Hajipur (Town),

Vaishali at Hajipur, PIN Code – 841001 (Bihar).

Hajipur (Town), District – Vaishali at

841001 (Bihar).

isional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, P.O. –

Danapur & District – Patna, PIN Code – 801105

Danapur & District – Patna, PIN Code –

The Senior Divisional Engineer (Co-Ordination), East Central

Danapur & District – Patna, PIN

Danapur & District – Patna, PIN Code –

The Section Engineer (P.Way), East Central Railway, Patna –

……… Respondents.

O R D E R (O R A L)

Per Sunil Kr. Sinha, Member [Admn]

The OA is listed for final hearing. Heard.

Learned counsel for applicant Shri M.P. Dixit submits

OA/050/00965/2019

January, 2024

Gopalpur

………. Applicant.

the General Manager, East Central

Hajipur (Town),

Vaishali at

–

801105

–

Ordination), East Central

Patna, PIN

–

–

……… Respondents.

Learned counsel for applicant Shri M.P. Dixit submits

second wife of

Late Keshwar, Ex Trackman working at East Central Railway, Patna

Junction retired from service on 31.12.2005.

first married Bulkaniya Devi who

permission

applicant and from their wedlock one son was born.

PPO was issued

died on 17.10.2015.

05.05.2010. After the death of Keshwa

repeated representation

family pension but the respondent authorities have turned deaf ear

her requests

Tribunal.

3.

75(7)(i)(a) of the Railway Services Pension Rule

that where the

family pension shall be paid to the widow

does not speak of whether

employee

late employee

4.

is thus entitled for family pension.

on the order of Hon'ble Patna High Court in CWJC No.358/2018 in

which the Hon'ble High Court dealt with the issue whether second

wife of erstwhile employee

// 2 //

second wife of a deceased railway employee. Applicant's husband

Late Keshwar, Ex Trackman working at East Central Railway, Patna

Junction retired from service on 31.12.2005.

married Bulkaniya Devi who remained

permission of his first wife Keshwar

applicant and from their wedlock one son was born.

was issued to Keshwar who continued to receive pension till

died on 17.10.2015. His first wife Bulkania Devi died

05.05.2010. After the death of Keshwa

repeated representations before the respondent authorities for grant of

family pension but the respondent authorities have turned deaf ear

her requests. Hence, the applicant was compel

Tribunal.

Learned counsel for applicant submits that Rule

)(i)(a) of the Railway Services Pension Rule

where the family pension is payable to more widows than

family pension shall be paid to the widow

does not speak of whether the widow

employee with official permission. It only

late employee would eligible for family pension

In the instant case, applican

is thus entitled for family pension. Learned counsel

on the order of Hon'ble Patna High Court in CWJC No.358/2018 in

which the Hon'ble High Court dealt with the issue whether second

wife of erstwhile employee, was entitled to get family pension as her

OA/050/00965/2019

deceased railway employee. Applicant's husband

Late Keshwar, Ex Trackman working at East Central Railway, Patna

Junction retired from service on 31.12.2005. Applicant’s husband had

remained issueless. Later with

Keshwar solemnized marriage with the

applicant and from their wedlock one son was born. After retirement,

continued to receive pension till he

first wife Bulkania Devi died before him on

05.05.2010. After the death of Keshwar, applicant of this OA gave

before the respondent authorities for grant of

family pension but the respondent authorities have turned deaf ear to

. Hence, the applicant was compelled to approach this

Learned counsel for applicant submits that Rule-

)(i)(a) o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top