Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ajay Pratap Singh, J, Sunil Kumar Sinha, A
Shashi Bhushan Singh – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India through the Director General of Post – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for pay fixation and recovery (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments supporting the applicant’s claim for pay protection (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 3. court's observations on pay fixation process (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 4. legal basis for recovery of excess payments (Para 54 , 55) |
| 5. conclusion of the case and dismissal of application (Para 64 , 65 , 66) |
ORDER
AS PER : AJAY PRATAP SINGH, MEMBER [JUDICIAL]
1. Applicant has filed present original application under Section- 19 of the Administrative Tribunals, Act 1985 to set-aside order no.PA- III/Pay Fixation/ S.B. Singh/880 filed as Annexure – A-1 received on 22.09.2017, whereby in the light of letter dated 25.07.2016 of the Government of India, Ministry of Communication & Information Technology, Department of Posts, New Delhi, the pay fixed in accordance with office letter dated 27.05.205 has been rectified and re-fixation of pay of the re-employment pensioner made and excess amount so paid of pay and allowances from 10.10.2006 to till date calculated for effecting recovery. The applicant has also sought direction to the respondents to restore the pay of applicant ₹14,500/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
