SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 3014

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Damyanti Yadav – Appellant
Versus
M/o Railways – Respondent


ORDER

Hon’ble Mr. Tarun Shridhar, Member (A) Aggrieved by an order dated 05.07.2019, vide which her representation with respect to grant of financial upgradation under Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme has been rejected, the applicant has approached this Tribunal by virtue of the instant OA praying for the following relief(s):

    “(i) That the Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass an order of quashing the impugned order dated 4.7.2019 (Annex. A/1), declaring to the effect that the same is illegal, arbitrary and against the law of the land and consequently, pass an order directing the respondents to consider and to grant the 1 financial upgradation to the applicant from the date of transfer in Grade pay of Rs. 4800/-(pre- revised) and 2nd financial upgradation in Grade Pay of Rs. 5400/- (pre-revised) from the date of completion of 20 years of service with all consequential benefits including the arrears of difference of pay and allowances with interest as per amended para 24 of MACP scheme and clarification issued by the GOI vide OM dt.

4.10.2012. (ii) any other relief which the Hon’ble Tribunal deem fit and proper may also be granted to the applicants a


    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top