Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member, Pragya Sahay Saksena, Administrative Member
Saral Singh Manhas – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's service history and impugned retirement order (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural history and challenge to retirement (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. parties' contentions on corruption and service record (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. object and scope of compulsory retirement regulations (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. judicial review requires entire service record consideration (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. committee's basis for retirement: fir involvement (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. mere fir involvement insufficient without guilt proof (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. quash retirement; grant service benefits (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
ORDER
Per:- Sanjeev Gupta, Judicial Member
The applicant is aggrieved of Government Order no. 1274-GAD of 2016 dated 21.11.2016 (hereinafter referred to as impugned order), whereby he was compulsorily retired from Government Service w.e.f. 22.11.2016 in exercise of powers under Article 226 (2) of the J&K Civil Service Regulations. The foundation for the impugned order was the involvement of the applicant and some others in case FIR No. 30 of 2006 registered in Vigilance Organization, Jammu on u/s Section 5(1) (d) read with 5(2) of the J&K Prevention of C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
